Once you have decided on a fixed checkpoint, the next question is how the scanner meets the road: a buried lane, where the unit is recessed flush into the surface, or a raised platform the vehicle drives over. The choice shapes civil works, drainage, vehicle clearance, throughput and cost - and it is expensive to change later. This guide compares both, from a manufacturer that builds fixed under-vehicle scanning systems in both orientations.
Buried (flush). The scanning unit is set into the road on a prepared foundation, imaging modules level with the surface. Vehicles drive over at normal checkpoint speed without a step; the underbody image builds as they pass. The engineering effort lives in the civil package: excavation, foundation, cable ducts and drainage.
Raised (surface-mounted). A platform or frame is mounted on top of the existing surface. The vehicle rolls over it slowly while the scan completes. Excavation is minimal and installation is faster, but approach angles become part of your vehicle-mix decision.
For a buried lane, drainage is the detail that decides long-term reliability: water management protects the imaging modules and keeps the road surface serviceable through rain and washdown. Plan the lane closure while works proceed - the civil phase, not the hardware, sets the project calendar.
A raised platform needs a level, load-bearing hardstanding rather than excavation. Site disruption is small and commissioning is quick. If your roadway cannot be opened up - or the works window is days, not weeks - raised is often the only practical orientation.
Because a buried lane is flush, it accepts the full vehicle mix - including low-clearance cars - and keeps the checkpoint's normal drive-through rhythm. That is why permanent, high-volume lanes at border posts and standard checkpoints are usually buried.
A raised platform asks vehicles to pass at crawl speed, and low sports cars need the approach angle checked before you commit. It suits cars and vans at medium volume and sites where drivers already slow down.
| Factor | Buried (flush) | Raised (surface) |
|---|---|---|
| Civil works | Excavation, foundation, ducts | Minimal; prepared hardstanding |
| Drainage | Engineered as part of the works | Surface drainage only |
| Vehicle clearance | Flush - any vehicle | Check approach angle |
| Throughput | Normal drive-through | Slow roll-over |
| Installation time | Follows the civil programme | Fast |
| Best fit | Permanent, high volume | Retrofit, medium volume |
The answer depends on four inputs a supplier should ask for before quoting: vehicle mix, throughput, site constraints and timeline. Seenboom builds the fixed under-vehicle scanning systems in both orientations and recommends one from a site survey - send us your site details and we will return an installation recommendation and itemized quotation within 24 hours.
Compare total installed cost, not hardware alone: a buried system carries civil works and drainage, a raised platform carries ramps and foundation preparation. The gap narrows where excavation is already happening.
Yes, with excavation and lane closure planned in advance. A site survey defines the foundation, cable routes and drainage before works start.
Check the approach angle and platform height against your vehicle mix. A flush buried installation avoids the question entirely, which is why mixed traffic usually points to buried.
Some raised platforms are designed to move with minimal works. For screening that changes sites regularly, a portable system is the purpose-built answer - see how portable UVSS deploys.
Four inputs: vehicle mix, throughput, site constraints (excavation, water, floor ownership) and timeline. A supplier should ask for all four before recommending an orientation.